Fast Level Up Pokemon Deluge

The Rule of 15

with a friend I was theorizing about beauty. We came to a conclusion quite superficial, shallow, naive, insolent and disagreeable to many. However, I think it has a handy utility that allows - by the way - some kind of understanding to explain the causes that lead men and women to form groups. '

The theory is totally and completely a moot point. Even more, on second thought, I now believe that our aesthetic theory has no basis, and more like a mockery of any kind of intellectual rigor. However I will tell it like, totally does not hurt. To begin, we assume that it is impossible to quantify, in a spectrum arbitrary number, the personal physical beauty ranges from the least beautiful (ugly) to the most beautiful (which leaves the mouth open). Granting this point, a question that I would not now but what the heck, if it concedes the point I say, we go a step further and explain why people look for certain types of couples from the physical point of view and not another.

Suppose the minimum value you can have our scale is 1. In other words, the number 1 represents the ugliest person there, the maximum horripilancia the ugliness at its best. I know what I will say that beauty (and ugliness accordingly) is a matter of taste is subjective and impossible to pigeonhole on numerical criteria a case of this nature. Ok. But let the game for a while. Also I said that I myself believe in this theory, but who cares. Ya. Now, on the other hand, suppose that the number 100 represents the absolute beauty. I do not know it, say, to see ... and, say Angelina Jolie is 100 just to say something. Finally, we note that physical beauty is comparable between genders. That is, there will be a man of highest and lowest score.

The conclusion therefore is that beauty in a range from 1 to 100 no one will be paired with someone who is at least 15 points away from his own score. So, if someone is 60 he will never be with someone 45 (it's too ugly for him), nor with someone 75 (and it is unattainable). Certainly can be any of the intermediate ranges. So I've always said that couples are alike. That is, not having physical resemblance, but are in a similar aesthetic level, and for the same reason we never see a stunning beauty with an ugly (and vice versa). Obviously this is assuming no interest rate baywatch woman who wants the old Texan for silver. On the other hand, this "theory" implies that the maximum ranges can only opt for someone with the same score or down (in the case of 100), or up (in the case of 1).