I've always heard about the importance of family in personal training. In theory (yes, in theory) the person who we are and what we have become, have a basis far in training we received as children. This is because the parents in the educational process, impose rules, criteria and true moral behavior patterns, identifying the good, the bad, right and wrong, and act accordingly to the extent that those conditions are met: when the fitness rewarding will coincide with its default behavior (congratulating, encouraging, or giving a cookie), or punished when the behavior is in contrast to the conception of "good" parent (challenging, scolding or hitting a coscacho). I have also heard that children are a mirror of their parents, in the sense that ultimately receive much of their own ethical guidelines but also, again in theory, could also inherit the negative as occurs in the family environment objectively bad behavior but that is common and tolerated. This will share up right there, because I do not have to discount - and no more - the individual cognition of the acts we commit and that, consciously, we can personally assess. The father is a thief, dishonest, interested, cruel or envious not necessarily mean that your child has to go out with the same features, but can be a probabilistic variable correlated.
The last time I've been thinking the importance of the family. This is because, for reasons not worth explaining here, it has been relatively absent or - rather - not all this that I like. This, indeed, does not mean much. Does not involve having a bad family or that it does not fulfill his duties inherent (opposite), but the subjective perception that clouds sometimes personal needs. But on the other hand, I have personal insight into cultural and social terms, there has been an increase in the family regardless of our age. I feel (without any evidence of what I say) that individualism wins the battle, and the ridiculous association Family protection to certain groups or institutions stale and old fashioned (read Church) allow the disaffection is regarded with a certain degree of pride and triumph of modern secularism. Obviously such issues I find funny - to say the least - but never cease to amaze the family histories of the generation just after mine, where parental absenteeism and indifference seem a recipe subsidiary permanent.
From what I've noticed is that the family is radically important, perhaps like no other human group is. I think it is something that must be protected, to be encouraging, to be wanting. I think that when one is eliminating layers superficiales de nuestra existencia social, es lo único que queda. Por la misma razón, aunque suene cursi y plagado de insípido romanticismo, uno de mis mayores metas a largo plazo es ser buen padre y formar una familia. Me parece que es una meta digna y me gustaría pensar que mi generación va hacia ese camino también.
